Public Forum Set for Saturday Goes On, Despite Controversy

Residents have raised concerns over possible soil contamination in Menifee, including parts of the new Audie Murphy Ranch development.
A Menifee town hall meeting scheduled for Saturday has confused residents regarding its purpose, changed sponsorship since its formation, and resulted in accusations against city and county officials.

The public forum will be held from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday at the Wooden Nickel Ranch, 25690 Holland Road. It will be sponsored by the newly formed Menifee Citizens for Honest Government and will be conducted by the group's creator, former mayoral candidate John F. Smith.

But that's not what it says on promotional fliers for the event that were circulated around town by another group of concerned citizens -- the Committee Against Toxic Exposure.

Members of CATE expressed concerns during a recent town hall meeting about the possible contamination of soil in Menifee by sludge -- toxins in processed sewage that was once used to fertilize agricultural fields in the area. Areas of concern include land where the Audie Murphy Ranch is being developed -- a project environmentally approved by Riverside County before Menifee was incorporated as a city.

A second public forum was organized to further discuss the issue, primarily under the direction of former city council candidate Carol "Red" Sullivan and Janine Matelko, a Menifee resident and longtime activist regarding soil contamination.

But today, Sullivan has removed herself from the issue. She asked not to be quoted for this article and said she will not attend the meeting. Meanwhile, Matelko said she also will skip the meeting and criticized Sullivan for her change of stance on the subject.

And amid all this, Smith -- who was asked to join in sponsoring the event on his group's behalf -- has pledged to carry on with the forum, and that "sludge will not be the forerunner of the event."

Got it?

The paving of Holland Road has been a primary
concern of John F. Smith's group.
Smith said the intent of the first public forum was to allow citizens to discuss any issues of concern. A planned primary topic was the controversy over the paving of a dirt portion of Holland Road west of Murrieta Road. However, Smith said the event "was almost highjacked" by activists wanting to make it all about the sludge issue.

"The meeting lasted 2 1/2 hours," Smith said. "Two hours and 10 minutes of it talked about sludge. For this meeting, the first thing will be to tell people what Menifee Citizens for Honest Government is all about. Second, the floor will be open to anyone. Sludge can be addressed, but this forum will not be highjacked."

CATE's leadership of the forum began to fall apart after Sullivan circulated an email saying she had changed her stance on the sludge issue following a meeting with an official who satisfactorily answered her questions. According to the email, Sullivan said she was shown documents and given explanation that a 1998 Environmental Impact Report for the Audie Murphy Ranch development showed that the land was not contaminated by Class B sludge.

In essence, Sullivan recanted her comments made at the Menifee City Council meeting a few days earlier, when she called for new soil testing in light of continued development in the area. Matelko's response was to accuse the city and county of threatening Sullivan with decreased funding for Sun City Concern -- a local nonprofit corporation of which Sullivan is president -- unless she backed off.

"She got an offer from the county if she backed out," said Matelko, who claims Sullivan told her this. "The statement was made that she was jeopardizing her funding if she didn't."

Sullivan denies that there was any such threat made in her lunch meeting with Marty Rosen, a member of the Riverside County Trails Committee. Rosen denied it as well.

"My private conversations have nothing to do with sludge," he said. "Anything about me threatening anybody is nonsense. We'll leave it at that."

Matelko has been outspoken about the issue of soil contamination ever since her daughter, 15-year-old Chrissy Garavito, died in 1997 of a heart condition in which doctors said pesticides may have been a contributing factor, according to an Inland Valley Daily Bulletin report. Matelko protested the spraying of pesticides at the middle school her daughter attended in Fontana.

According to Smith, Matelko asked him for help in bringing awareness to the sludge issue in Saturday's forum. He said he asked for copies of Riverside County documents Matelko said proves that toxic sludge was dumped in the Audie Murphy Ranch area after 1998, but she has refused to provide them.

"People have had copies of these records before," Matelko said. "People from the city say the records are tainted, that they've been Photoshopped. That's the reason I don't let my documents out.

"My daughter died from chemicals. I think this whole city is corrupt. Now they have Carol Sullivan."

Smith said he is sympathetic to the concerns of Matelko but that he can't represent a cause for which he is not given the necessary resources.

"I've talked to people who are kind of confused about these meetings and their purpose now," Smith said. "They say, 'I thought the intent of these meetings was that we could bring any issue forward.' That's right.

"This sludge issue is a very big issue. But I can't fight a fight if you don't give me the ammunition. She doesn't want to give anybody the documents. My philosophy is, you never speak in facts if you can't substantiate them."

Another public forum, this one sponsored by the City of Menifee, will be held in late February or early March to allow residents to address the issue of sludge.




5 Comments:

  1. If I had a smoking gun document I would use it, I would take this issue to the people and show them this document to try and get extra support. How this article sounds, is that Matelko is using her tragic death of her daughter to help spur her on to create an issue. If this issue is factual then it should be examined, but with no proof then I would tend to believe the paid expert who said its ok. I completely understand that corruption is out there, but I also know people use potential corruption allegations against those that don’t side with their plight.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As for the Hijacked statement, What an understatement...The Audience was so shocked by the records and information, It was the Community who asked for another meeting...As for Carol Sullivan...She reviewed records, I will post below...Submitted by Janine Matelko..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doug.....thanks for explaining what was suppose to go on at the Meeting at Wooden Nickel Ranch Saturday. After reading article in the Press today it sounds like this meeting had one subject ONLY in mind and even kicked people from the audience out for fear of what they might see or hear! That really makes me wonder!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I disagree with the comment of one resident “It’s not just the vague suspicions of some nice but unbalanced people” I believe it is exactly that. If you look at the past behavior of the vocal proponents of this issue it becomes very clear they are driven by paranoia. Couple this with the efforts of a couple of council members to curry favor of the vocal few and you get the result of a meeting that was closed to all but believers in the same dogma

    ReplyDelete
  5. It appears a lot of lack of communication is going on here, at least Mr. Smith was smart enough to catch what was taking place, address it and moved on with his meeting. I understand Ms. Matelki's concerns, she needs to get someone to give her the results, who wrote them based on what, if need be meet with those those wrote up the test and results, IF the sludge has NOT been removed then take further action, if it has been removed (which sounds like it has) then you have to take these tests as absolute and move on. It appears her emotions are getting in the way of the truth. I'm deeply sorry for the loss, you must mourn, get the truth and move on. It appears the truth in these test and documents are the answer.

    ReplyDelete

Menifee 24/7 welcomes comments from readers in response to posts on our website and on our Facebook page. Comments on our website must be submitted through a Google account with the user's full name. No anonymous comments are allowed. On both the website and our Facebook page, use of profanity, personal attacks, statement as fact of things that have not been substantiated, or statements of a generally offensive tone are prohibited.

Loading