Menifee Mayor Scott Mann Clarifies Position on Homelessness

Editor's note: The following is a letter from Menifee Mayor Scott Mann to members of the Interfaith and Community Service Council. Mann ...

Editor's note: The following is a letter from Menifee Mayor Scott Mann to members of the Interfaith and Community Service Council. Mann shared this with Menifee 24/7 in an attempt to clarify for our readers his position on homelessness. Recently, the Menifee City Council unanimously approved a letter of opposition to Assembly Bill 5, which would increase homeless persons' rights in public places and require cities to provide 24-hour hygiene facilities. The Homeless Person's Bill of Rights and Fairness Act, introduced by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco), was introduced last December.


April 1, 2013
Chairwoman
Menifee Interfaith and Community Service Council

RE: Mayor Scott Mann's Opposition to AB 5 (Ammiano, D-San Francisco)

Dear Chairwoman and Council,

This letter attempts to clarify my personal position on homelessness which, I feel, may be misunderstood in light of the City Council's decision to unanimously oppose AB 5. Let me be clear that the views expressed in this letter are mine, and mine alone. I have not changed the view I expressed on several occasions during the 2012 mayoral campaign and previously in the 2008 inaugural city council campaign: I am in favor of a homeless shelter in, or near, Menifee.

I am, however, opposed to AB 5 (Ammiano), the “Homeless Person's Bill of Rights and Fairness Act." The Los Angeles Times says “While we sympathize with its (AB 5's) spirit, we don't support it. The solution is not to sanction the culture of homelessness or to offer blanket approval for a way of life that society generally agrees should be ended." (1/11/13)

This bill, which even its author, Assembly Member Ammiano, concedes is "aspirational," would impose unfunded mandates upon cities while adding homelessness to a listing of protected classes. Under the bill, “life-sustaining activities that must be carried out in public spaces because of homelessness," such as eating, urinating, amassing possessions and collecting trash to recycle, would be protected. The bill is silent as to the rights of residents, businesses and taxpayers to clean streets and safe, habitable neighborhoods.

As a public official, I feel that I must be compassionate and responsible at the same time. Assembly Member Ammíano's bill takes the wrong approach -- one which is goodhearted toward the homeless and hardhearted towards the rest of the community simultaneously. Round-the-clock public bathrooms and the "basic human right" to panhandle alone have huge implications for local budgets and law enforcement. The costs of AB 5 have not yet been counted, but I feel confident the State of California will not appropriate funds to support mandates imposed on cities and counties.

For all of the reasons outlined above, I oppose AB 5. I do not oppose giving our homeless a ‘hand up' through faith-based organizations and non-profit service organizations. I am in favor of a homeless shelter, especially one that has mental health, drug and alcohol counseling, and job placement components to help restore individuals and families to safe, productive lives. I would work with you toward that goal.

Lastly, I would call your attention to the UT-Californian's recent editorial under their "Roses and Raspberries" column of April 1, 2013. Let's work together in the spirit of our several religions to try and help the unfortunate among us. Let's not make community vitality more difficult by imposing expensive, unfair legislation upon our cities and their residents.

Very respectfully yours,
Scott A. Mann
Mayor, City of Menifee

Related

Scott Mann 5601434897272012975

Post a Comment

  1. Interesting and informational letter. However, let's put ourselves in the position of a family that perhaps just lost their home here in Menifee. Let's also assume that they have younger kids, perhaps even infants. Assume the father is working in an industry that has not made it back yet and he's having difficulty locating a job that can make a dent into a living wage. Where in Menifee would a family like that go? What faith based shelters exist in Menifee? What non-profit shelters exist in Menifee? Or, should the family just plan on getting out of town and trying to go somewhere else?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly,Anonymous! Where in Menifee is there a shelter for our homeless? And I say, "our" homeless! There are a lot of citizens of Menifee that need our help. I, for one, would volunteer at this shelter.

      Delete
  2. Robert EntricanApril 02, 2013 9:30 AM

    Thank you for sharing Doug ...

    This story has created a great opportunity for all of us to remember that when we elect officials, we put them into positions of authority to carry out the people's business and NOT their own personal agenda.

    All too often, people cast votes with the "hope" that a chosen candidate thinks like they do and that somehow they have the superpower to read the minds of their constituents. This is clearly not the case and we must all remember that we should "regularly", "constructively", and openly "communicate" with our district representative to ensure our voice is heard.

    I feel great sadness for those families and individuals who are struggling with these challenging times, but it's a function of organizations like the Red Cross, Salvation Army, Habitat for Humanity, and others to create the social safety net we need for these families in a momentary chaos - NOT local, state, or federal government.

    Many in Washington seem so focused on the bottom line profitability of private enterprise when they "could" be looking closer at the shrinking performance of non-profits yet contributions and executive salaries within those companies are at record levels. I'd really like to see more focus on those who "claim" to exist for the purpose helping those in need, because I see some pretty lavish empires surrounding those companies.

    Thank you to Scott for clarifying his position and kudos for a well written letter that felt more personal than political.

    Respectfully,


    Robert Entrican

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Let me be clear that the views expressed in this letter are mine, and mine alone.”
      “As a public official, I feel.........”
      “Mayor, City of Menifee”
      Well written?

      Delete
    2. How hard is this, dude? What's your point? Since the City Council did just unanimously approve a letter of opposition to Assembly Bill 5, the Mayor is simply saying that the views he's expressing are his, and his alone, that they are not being expressed on behalf of the entire City Council. You act as though you have a point, .. but you don't. You're obviously the same person who wrote the "Anonymous April 02, 2013 11:25 AM" comment below, and you can say it ten more times, and it still won't turn your "non point" into a point.

      Delete
  3. The only thing this letter clarifies is the lack of sensibility of the author. The letter is nothing more than a crudely written PR piece. While it is widely recognized this bill places an undo burden on cities and has little benefit for the recipients, this letter does nothing to clarify that. Instead it is a self aggrandizing attempt to tout what a compassionate person he is to veterans and homelessness.
    The truth of the matter is the only thing he has done about these issues is talk about them. He starts out with the insincere statement that the views are as a private individual, yet he signs it as “Mayor”. The only thing that surprises me is he didn’t send along a photo with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To the "Anonymous" commenter above. It is so improper to publicly publish a statement that is written solely out of meanness and with no consideration for substance or fairness. It's obvious you didn't like the mayor even before you read this article and you've simply found an opportunity to express your dislike regardless of what the mayor wrote.

      How cowardly to attack "the author" as insensible, .. self-aggrandizing, .. just a talker and not a doer, .. and claim that he was improper to sign the letter as "Mayor". Your "opinion" obviously comes from a previous bias and not from a fair analysis of what he wrote. And no one here cares about listening to anyone's previous biases because we all know that EVERYONE in public office has venomous enemies, usually because the haters have their own personal agenda.

      Most of the people I know who have interacted with the Mayor -- whether they agree with all his views or not -- respect him as a VERY sensible person, .. the OPPOSITE of self-aggrandizing while at the same time able to appropriately apply the authority that he's expected to as Mayor, .. and a hard-working doer.

      The only way you concocted a "legitimate" point was to first make a false statement about him and then attack your own false statement. You said that the Mayor started out with the statement that "the views are as a private individual", and then you attacked him for signing as "Mayor". Well, as every honest person can read, he did NOT say that the views are as a private individual; he said, "the views expressed in this letter are mine, and mine alone", simply meaning that he wasn't speaking for the Council. But you knew that. Whether or not he's solely expressing his own personal opinion or making a statement expressing the official opinion of the entire Council, it is not only appropriate but responsibly expected for him to sign, as "Mayor", every statement he makes, in writing, to any organization or public forum, since that's who he is.

      Also, you are apparently so wrapped up in your own negativity that you didn't even notice -- or care -- that at the beginning of the article, the website Editor clearly noted that the Mayor's letter wasn't even written for the general public; it was written to the Interfaith and Community Service Council of Menifee .. and then shared with Menifee 24/7 for the practical additional purpose of providing the public with an opportunity to also be informed regarding his simple but well-considered and well-written stand on the matter.

      I'm not in politics, so I can just take Mr. Mann at face value without any biased motive to unfairly ( and very cheaply, without any real substance, I might add ) put him down publicly as you did. I guess, since no one is perfect ( except probably you ), everyone can legitimately find something negative to write about anyone else if they look long and hard enough, but if you're going to do it publicly, you should at least have some genuine substance to share with us. I guess that's why you just wrote your opinion anonymously; that way, only you alone have to know that you just made yourself out to be a mean-spirited and unfair coward.

      I don't mind reading -- and I can even respect -- negative comments that have substance and are constructive, but frankly, your negativity pretty much just "stinks up the page" with no honest point or purpose other than to tell readers that you don't like the mayor; and since you're "anonymous", .. who cares?

      If I'm wrong about you and you actually have some substance, maybe you could write your own opinion on Assembly Bill 5, and publish it in Menifee 24/7 and let the public evaluate if it's as well written and well rounded as Mayor Mann's written letter.

      Richard Melrose

      Delete
  4. Writing a private letter and then sending it to the media for publication is one of the oldest ruses used by a political lightweight to garner attention.
    Regardless of what spin (which sycophants are wont to do) you put on this self-serving communiqué it remains pompous bloviating.
    Blowing your own horn is akin to giving yourself a haircut: Unless you are shaving your head, who the barber was is obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Sun City area would be a good spot for a homeless shelter.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Robert EntricanApril 03, 2013 1:15 PM

    It troubles me to read some of the comments by anonymous contributors who seem to believe "every" move a politician makes is driven by an alternative agenda.

    I'm not naive, I'm a practical minded registered voter and I do everything I can to understand issues and candidates before casting a vote - a unique approach by the looks of the anonymous comments here.

    Why can't something just "be" what it is?

    I don't have an agenda driving my participating in this article and I don't conduct conversations designed to divide people and belittle public officials ... BUT ... I can proudly applaud Mayor Mann's effort to make it "VERY" clear that he separates his personal view from that of his elected duties. I wish MORE elected officials were capable of this sort of logic.

    I appreciate his personal belief that helping those in need is a humanitarian effort better served through community faith and non-profit organizations instead of tax dollars.

    For those of you who are so unhappy with council, I'd encourage you to find a way to channel your frustration into a plan that compels you to participate in the democratic process and voice what you'd like to see changed.

    It's not your job to sit back and complain - get involved ... just do so in a civil and constructive manner.

    Respectfully,


    Robert Entrican

    ReplyDelete
  7. By most accounts the City Council did a prudent thing in opposing Assembly Bill 5.
    Writing a personal letter with the underlying message: “I don’t care who gets the credit as long as you know the idea was mine”, is a bit overweening. Sending it for publication is pompous bloviating.
    Some are rankled that the underlying message of the letter has been exposed, but consider this: You have been presented with an opportunity to curry favor and get your name in front of the Menifee Mayor. I am sure a dedicated; autographed portrait, suitable for framing, will be headed your way soon. I didn’t want one (it would clash with my Kum-By-Ya poster of Wally) that is why I didn’t sign my name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous, .. you're so comfortable with just making stuff up and taking "cheap shots". Your disposition is to try to belittle people by just saying whatever you want. You've written a lot of negativity without the integrity of building it upon a single valid point.

      You're having an uncontrolled extreme fit over an elected official publishing and "taking credit" for his opinion as though it is improper, when in fact, that's just the way "ELECTED" office works. Elected public officials are elected to office -- and stay in office -- by publishing their opinions, so the public can know what they stand for. How else do you expect the public to know what their opinions are? Don't you even know the concept of "Elected Office"? Maybe you vote by using Tarot cards, but I want to know what candidates' opinions are about things; and since elected officials don't have the time to go around to everyone's home, individually, and talk over tea, the most practical way is to take credit for their opinions and actions and accomplishments .. and even their screwups .. by publishing them for all to see.

      Your presumption that you've "rankled" ( to those readers who just speak normally, that means "annoyed"; why people like to use strange "Words of the Day" that they just learned is a whole different subject ).. your presumption that you've "rankled" people by exposing what you claim is the "underlying message of [Mayor Mann's] letter" is actually funny. You've overrated yourself to think that your negativity -- without supporting it with any valid points -- has "rankled" anyone.

      Then, not only are you having a fit about things that don't even make sense, you again ( as you did with the Mayor ) just make up stuff and then accuse this article's commenters of it. I guess when you have no substance you have to do that, but even cloaked in humor, it's unfair and cheap. What a petty accusation to say that those who support the Mayor's opinion -- and the logic to publish it -- are doing it just to "curry favor" from the Mayor. Your accusations simply expose the way YOU think and why you do what YOU do; so it's probably safe to assume that your publishing your comments have basically just been "pompous bloviating".

      By the way, since "bloviating" already means doing something pompously, your phrase "pompous bloviating" is redundant. I guess that was another "Word of the Day" you recently learned. But I totally understand; .. if you can't impress people with valid points to support what you have to say, then you should probably [ attempt to ] impress them by continuing to learn and use words that most people don't [ and don't care to ] understand.

      One last thing: you say you didn't sign your name because you didn't want an autographed portrait of the Mayor. Since you know you wouldn't have gotten one anyway, you're obviously trying to use your humor to cover up the real reason, which, as I said before, is because even you're not proud of your rantings, since they're just accusations without any valid supportive points to back them up.

      Richard Melrose

      Delete
    2. Some believe by the sheer volume of their words they can deflect the true purpose of this letter from Mann. The evidence is Prima facie: A private letter was written and sent for publication. The purpose of his doing this and the underlying message is what is difficult for some to grasp. Taken on its face, the letter may seem to be rather innocuous. However, when you compare it with the past writings and actions of the author it becomes clear what the intent is. It certainly is not some magnanimous gesture to inform.
      It seems obvious from the opprobrious remarks by some that they believe they are informed but in reality are woefully ignorant. There is much more to knowing a candidate than listening to their campaign speeches and reading their ads or as some suggest by using tarot cards... You also have to look at their past associations and accomplishments and reconcile that with what they say.
      If you believe they are going to publish, for all to see, anything negative you are at best naive.
      It’s encouraging to see that some are using their dictionary (albeit reluctantly). A good word for the day to get familiar with is “Meta-cognition”.

      Delete

emo-but-icon

Follow Us












































Popular

Recent

Comments

Subscribe Via E-mail

Have the latest articles and announcements on Menifee 24/7 delivered to your e-mail address.
Email Format
item