tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post5318028292065237543..comments2024-03-08T13:49:02.231-08:00Comments on Menifee 24/7: Signs, Signs, Everywhere are SignsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04404091189792961642noreply@blogger.comBlogger163125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-28258178982839863892008-10-16T07:12:00.000-07:002008-10-16T07:12:00.000-07:00Are you accusing Harris of committing a crime?Are you accusing Harris of committing a crime?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-80409724254157942262008-10-15T22:21:00.000-07:002008-10-15T22:21:00.000-07:00Oh contrair Harris!The secret checks YOU wrote to ...Oh contrair Harris!<BR/><BR/>The secret checks YOU wrote to yourself were NOT signed by the CFO. (Oops!)<BR/><BR/>An investigation into this sham has indeed been initiated.<BR/><BR/>I understand you have two Attorneys working on your behalf. It may be wise to bring on a third!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-20585011359400456702008-10-15T22:13:00.000-07:002008-10-15T22:13:00.000-07:00No matter how they try to explain it, SAVARD ROAC...No matter how they try to explain it, SAVARD ROACH and STAMPER are DICTATING to this community what THEY think is good for it.<BR/><BR/>LIKE SPENDING OVER 60000 dollars pursuing law suits with NO DAMAGES.<BR/><BR/>AND SUING 58 HOMEOWNERS!!!<BR/><BR/>IT is easy to make it look like you are saving money when all you do is cut services.<BR/><BR/>Being ahead of budget means nothin when you pad the budget, and George and Rick do.<BR/><BR/>The real question is why wer are not 125,000 under budget? They cut security services in the community to ZERO. That was over a hundred thousand. They were budget to spend over 5000 on boats. They did not by closing the boats down for no good reason.<BR/><BR/>That is 125000 PLUS we are now told that they got 250000 in past due dues. It does not take a rocket scientist or a ONE YEAR COLLEGE STUDENT FROM GEORGIA to add those numbers. We should be showing a surplus of $375000 and according to Davis Stirling, that means a REFUND to each homeowner.<BR/><BR/>Let's see if we get it!<BR/><BR/>WE are only told by this board what they want to tell us. Take an interest! Recall this board! Do NOT re elect that scoundrel George Moffitt and his co hort in clandestine secret meetings and lies, Susan Vejar.<BR/><BR/>RECALL THIS BOARD BEFORE THEY DESTROY THE DELEGATE DISTRICT SYSTEM.<BR/><BR/>SIGN THE PETITION<BR/><BR/>NEW GOVERNMENT>>> TIME FOR A FRESH START !!!<BR/><BR/>THERE IS NO ROOM ON TEH BOARD FOR SELF AGRANDIZING, EVIL, VENGEFUL, BOARD MEMBERS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-80410396887457479302008-10-15T22:05:00.000-07:002008-10-15T22:05:00.000-07:00Every check was signed by the CFO. And HE had acc...Every check was signed by the CFO. And HE had access to all cash and money on deposit.<BR/><BR/>I suggest an investigation into George Moffitt. It has already been proved that the bamboozled the emmons company out of things for free using his position, that all other menifee residens would have to pay for. <BR/><BR/>It is on the record for all to see. <BR/><BR/>The associaton CFO is RESPONSIBLE for all financial. When he signs a check, it means he not only understood where the money went, but approved of it.<BR/><BR/>That is one of the reasons he was RECALLED. "financial irregularities".<BR/><BR/>PLEASE EVERYONE SIGN THE PETITION FOR RECALL. WE WILL BE AROUND COLLECTING FOR SIGNATURES AS SOON AS THE VOTE RESULTS ARE IN.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-3406599366255028862008-10-14T11:11:00.000-07:002008-10-14T11:11:00.000-07:00This board is ONE MILLION DOLLARS ahead of budget?...This board is ONE MILLION DOLLARS ahead of budget???? Holy cow!! (no, it really is not one million under budget-that's absurd!)<BR/><BR/>Seriously, the previous poster has NO IDEA what they are talking about!<BR/><BR/>The fact is Menifee Lakes is indeed $80,000.00 UNDER BUDGET.<BR/><BR/>Security was not cut as described by the previous poster.<BR/><BR/>The fact is that the new Lake Manager who also manages the Beach & Swim Club inheirted a budget based on Don Harris' excessive spending, as the terminated Lake/Beach Club manager.<BR/><BR/>The real question is not how we are so far under budget, the REAL question is why did Harris spend so much of our money, when he was in that position. It is now obvious that Harris spent more than what was needed! <BR/><BR/>WHERE DID THE MONEY GO, HARRIS???<BR/><BR/>Time will tell where Harris spent our money.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-5064612324663472322008-10-14T10:07:00.000-07:002008-10-14T10:07:00.000-07:00To the previous poster.... you are an uninformed i...To the previous poster.... you are an uninformed individual or you are and idiot.<BR/><BR/>This board is only $1000000 ahead of budget. <BR/><BR/>Now given that they have CUT over 130,000 in security services alone, and they were gifted with a property management company who charged about 80000 less than emmons. The reality is that they ARE wasting money. They are over spending in the categories that require management of resources.<BR/><BR/>They ARE guilty of wasteful spending and anyone who looks at the financials can see it.<BR/><BR/>Don't fall for their rhetoric.<BR/><BR/>I can cut my budget by 25% if I stop having a phone, shut off my electricity, and gas, and stop eating anything but cereal.<BR/><BR/>But the association is not in a position where it EVER was in financial difficulty.<BR/><BR/>ONLY the smoke and mirros of George Moffitt which was self agrandizing and false.<BR/><BR/>Yes our dues are the same. But look at what services were cancelled, and what excess spending took place.<BR/><BR/>This is a DANGEROUS BOARD because they lie to us.<BR/><BR/>I say get rid of them. SIGN the petition. RECALL THIS BOARD!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-80999644541155917472008-10-13T23:35:00.000-07:002008-10-13T23:35:00.000-07:00The poster at 9:25am forgot the most important acc...The poster at 9:25am forgot the most important accomplishment of the current board ( minus harris and hyneman);<BR/><BR/>THEY PUT A STOP TO WASTFUL SPENDING AND THE DUES HAVE BEEN KEPT DOWN!!!!<BR/><BR/>For once, we have some guys who ran on a campaign of keeping the dues down and they delivered!!<BR/><BR/>I really don't give a crap about anything else! <BR/><BR/>Thanks Jerry, Jim, and Rick!!!!!!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-37076527792633180152008-10-13T16:09:00.000-07:002008-10-13T16:09:00.000-07:00Must have been another "anger issue".Must have been another "anger issue".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-2177691595627642662008-10-13T14:25:00.000-07:002008-10-13T14:25:00.000-07:00No name calling folks!No name calling folks!Steve Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07254867681706917705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-86317606542827072952008-10-13T14:08:00.000-07:002008-10-13T14:08:00.000-07:00Harris,according to RSO Incident Report #PC0728110...Harris,<BR/><BR/>according to RSO Incident Report #PC07281106 you don't live here anymore either!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-5921272013424757982008-10-13T13:53:00.000-07:002008-10-13T13:53:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-51161604499659787822008-10-13T11:36:00.000-07:002008-10-13T11:36:00.000-07:00Anyone who thinks that this board is not in bed wi...Anyone who thinks that this board is not in bed with avalon need look no further than the FIVE THOUSAND DOLLAR DONATION MADE BY AVALON to BOARD PRESIDENT JERRY STAMPER to get the answer.<BR/><BR/>Ken it is surprising to see you posting here.<BR/><BR/>You don't live here. You should stick to your own business.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-23411179001584445832008-10-13T09:25:00.000-07:002008-10-13T09:25:00.000-07:00re: oct 12 @ 12:14pm,I am wondering about your com...re: oct 12 @ 12:14pm,<BR/><BR/>I am wondering about your comments about trusting some members of the current board and the 1M dollar budget.<BR/><BR/>I actually contacted Avalon and asked for an update on the "business" of this association.<BR/><BR/>According to Avalon, things have never been better. In fact, Menifee Lakes may be recognized as "Association of the Year" for the way the Officers of this board have performed.<BR/><BR/>1. Menifee Lakes is way under budget.<BR/><BR/>2. Menifee Lakes has cash in it's operating accounts every month, after paying expenses.<BR/><BR/>3. Facilities look great.<BR/><BR/>4. No one is stealing from us.<BR/><BR/>5. Unpaid assessments are being collected.<BR/><BR/>6. etc., etc.<BR/><BR/>Again, the "business" of this association is outstanding. <BR/><BR/>Where did you get your information, that formed your opinion that trust was an issue?<BR/><BR/>Why are you so intent on damaging the reputation of our community, when the facts tell us, Menifee Lakes is in great shape?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-88480015370252819062008-10-12T20:43:00.000-07:002008-10-12T20:43:00.000-07:00"this thing would have died out years ago"??!!What..."this thing would have died out years ago"??!!<BR/><BR/>What planet do you live on??!!<BR/><BR/>Harris continues to sue innocent members (yes, plural) of this association, The Riverside Sheriff's Department, Riverside County, and the Deputy who gave so much time and effort to start Neighborhood Watch in our neighborhoods!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<BR/><BR/>This "thing" could have died months ago had Harris just accepted the advice to just return the property and money owed to MLMA, and move on, no questions asked; BUT Harris chose to stick it to the membership and continues to do just that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-66988027503938270652008-10-12T14:33:00.000-07:002008-10-12T14:33:00.000-07:00Oh PLEASE!Harris decides to do a talk show, and pe...Oh PLEASE!<BR/><BR/>Harris decides to do a talk show, and people call in to ask valid questions, which Harris refuses to ask; and you call that "harassment"?<BR/><BR/>Give me a break!<BR/><BR/>You need to look up the Restraining Orders issued against Harris to realize what true harassment is!<BR/><BR/>Why do you have an issue with the Ducks? Those duck calls were hilarious! The only thing funnier than those duck calls was listening to the guest (harris), who was nothing short of an ignorant windbag.<BR/><BR/>Is it any wonder why only three members take him seriously? <BR/><BR/>Which raises a valid point-With the fact that Harris does have two restraining orders filed against him, and the substantiated allegations made (documents available at menifeetruth.com) why would anyone support this guy?<BR/><BR/>Help me out here. Give me one good reason why ANYONE who requires TWO RESTRAINING ORDERS and has SUED their own membership and has DAMAGED the facilities; as Harris has, be trusted to serve those same members?<BR/><BR/>Please take your time and give an intelligent answer, one that is to the point and void of deflection and vague B.S.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-87253314005404299322008-10-12T12:14:00.000-07:002008-10-12T12:14:00.000-07:00Lets not forget that past board members as well as...Lets not forget that past board members as well as one still running AGAIN (AFTER he was recalled): GEORGE MOFFITT! AS WELL AS CHRYSTAL MACFARLAND BOTH SUED THE ASSOCIATION AND LOST THE LAWSUIT...Interesting and is it true that the association won in that suit and was also awarded atty fees to be paid by MacFarland and Moffitt; And is it true that the board at that time REALLY voted to forgive the reimbursement and pay out of homeowner dues, the atty fees incurred by the board for their lawsuit? Can anyone help the homeowners understand WHY its entirely okay for some individuals to sue the association and NOT okay for others? How can they choose to make such a big deal and keep pounding that Harris is suing the association like its an unheard and dastardly thing, when he's only defending himself?<BR/>IF this board of three would let the motto 'live and let live' replace their personal grudges and undaunting egos, this thing would have died out years ago and the community would be in peace! But NO!, they continue to LOOK for ways to finish their vendettas and it is costing ALL homeowners dearly in every way. SHAMEFUL what these three have torn apart in this community. History is a good conscience in how to improve and learn, but not for them. ANYONE listening in to that radio broadcast got a good taste of what these men (whoops,forgot, they like to be called 'the boyz'), are like by their trying to turn it into another lynching. THAT's how they operate and THAT'S why they have only about 10-20 homeowners (if they're lucky and its always the same 'groupies' looking for a night out) out of 1853 homes attending their 'shows'. Did you notice how many PERSONAL questions they tried to get in; People, <BR/>Think about it: Would YOU have answered such as "are you fulltime employed" and other personal questions that are none of their business!? These men wouldn't know how to respect anyone's boundaries as humans. Yet Harris did respond honestly and calmly. There's no such thing as appeasing men of this caliber; it just whets their appetite. Then their insisting to be rude with that stupid duckcall over the air? Harrassment? Yes, I'd say so. Folks, put this garbage all together..does it sound like these people are ones YOU'D want as a board to handle annual budgets in excess of $1M and to have to ask them to authorize all architectural improvements, etc that you want to do to your own property, from what trees you can plant, what colors you can paint, etc. etc. ? NO! FOLKS; WAKE UP, these men can't control their OWN lives, much less be in authority ! NO, I AM NOT HARRIS, as they like to claim all their critics are; BUT I am a HOMEOWNER who is ashamed of them and their harrassing antics thrust on our community! WE ARE ASHAMED OF THEM !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-37968548285605025102008-10-12T09:56:00.000-07:002008-10-12T09:56:00.000-07:00Hey Harris supporter @October 11, 2008 4:24 PM:Rea...Hey Harris supporter @October 11, 2008 4:24 PM:<BR/><BR/>Read the Novel written by another "anonymous" harris supporter (assumed to be harris) October 11, 2008 1:37 PM,<BR/><BR/>where Harris asks why the ASSOCIATION IS STILL PICKING UP THE TAB OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS to defend a former board member who is still the target of the friviolous suit by Harris.<BR/><BR/>Take off your blinders, and open your eyes and mind. Do as Harris has said, "put your thinking cap on".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-83725575962836930742008-10-12T07:39:00.000-07:002008-10-12T07:39:00.000-07:00HEY!!!WHAT OTHER LAWSUIT?I know Harris sued us in ...HEY!!!<BR/><BR/>WHAT OTHER LAWSUIT?<BR/><BR/>I know Harris sued us in October of 2006, but what is up with this lawsuit in 2005? <BR/><BR/>This is nuts! MLMA was sued in 2005because of Harris?<BR/><BR/>Two lawsuits in consecutive years? No wonder there are many who want Harris to "just go away"!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-70180300529401177202008-10-11T22:48:00.000-07:002008-10-11T22:48:00.000-07:00When Harris caused a lawsuit against the associati...When Harris caused a lawsuit against the association in 2005, it cost us deductables and premiun increases for insurance.<BR/><BR/>In 2006 when Harris sued the association, we again were out the deductable and you can bet the premiums skyrocketed.<BR/><BR/>So, don't try and B.S. us with "it didn't cost a dime" balony!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-50503028772719384992008-10-11T17:06:00.000-07:002008-10-11T17:06:00.000-07:00OK Don, whatever,What about Judy Hyneman's HUG...OK Don, whatever,<BR/><BR/>What about Judy Hyneman's HUGE banner that violates the CC&Rs as well as Law?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-12977263301080162982008-10-11T16:24:00.000-07:002008-10-11T16:24:00.000-07:00first off this is not from harris.any judgement in...first off this is not from harris.<BR/><BR/>any judgement in any lawsuit against the association except for punitive awards are paid for by the insurance co.<BR/><BR/>don't be ignorant<BR/><BR/>the only money spent by the association on any lawsuits is the money they (our money)have spent going after harris- not dime has spent defending<BR/><BR/>that is a lie<BR/><BR/>and stop lyingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-85171009815240155132008-10-11T15:02:00.000-07:002008-10-11T15:02:00.000-07:00Don Haris:Since this thread originally started as ...Don Haris:<BR/><BR/>Since this thread originally started as a story on "signs", and you signed one your opinions on political signs,<BR/><BR/>What is your opinion on your running mate Judy Hyneman's 4ft.X 8ft. banner that is located on her house? (tacky isn't it?!)<BR/><BR/>After all, we know the LAW allows political signs and banners that measure less than 15 sq. ft.<BR/><BR/>(hint: do the math)<BR/><BR/>Do you support her breaking the MLMA Governing Documents and Law in her quest to becoming a Board Member?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-78487645155243969312008-10-11T14:42:00.000-07:002008-10-11T14:42:00.000-07:00The comment posted at 1:50PM hit it right on the h...The comment posted at 1:50PM hit it right on the head!<BR/><BR/>Harris has no idea what he has done, nor what he is doing. He is completely out of control!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-8362294250833693812008-10-11T13:50:00.000-07:002008-10-11T13:50:00.000-07:00Whoever posted the short Novel above is misinforme...Whoever posted the short Novel above is misinformed or ignorant.<BR/><BR/>The "association" IS the membership!<BR/><BR/>The membership IS each homeowner!<BR/><BR/>When Harris sued the association this was in fact a suit against each member (homeowner)of the association!<BR/><BR/>Who would have paid any award to such a lawsuit? You guessed it!<BR/>Every member of the association.<BR/><BR/>Harris, the membership is on to you. The reason your 3rd Amended Complaint did not include the association, is because the Court eliminated them after your 2nd Amended Complaint!<BR/><BR/>Could it be that you don't know what you have done?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5181366.post-29314118169041718572008-10-11T13:37:00.000-07:002008-10-11T13:37:00.000-07:00I would hope that the above comments were NOT made...I would hope that the above comments were NOT made by a board member.<BR/><BR/>Let's not play with words. I took the above comments to heart and did look up and read the entire case! (whew! it took me a couple of hours)<BR/><BR/>It would seem that there is truth to both arguments.<BR/><BR/>Here's why.<BR/><BR/>A plaintifff in a law suit determines what he or she will allege. Those are called causes of action.<BR/><BR/>A defendant demurrs wherein he or she makes no defense for whether or not the allegations are true or false, but states that even if the actions occurred they did not constitute a civil tort.<BR/><BR/>Usually the plaintiff is given an opportunity to 'reword' the causes of action under present scrutiny of the court.<BR/><BR/>This is called a granting of the demurrer 'with leave to amend'.<BR/><BR/>The plaintiff's attorney then goes back to the drawing board and tries to re assert the allegations in a format that would (if found true) consititute a civil tort. That then creates a triable fact and would warrant an overruling of a subsequent demurrer on the same issue.<BR/><BR/>In the original complaint Mr. Harris alleged in the <BR/>3rd and 4th causes of action tort liability on the part of the association Each of these causes of action named specifically the Association. (board of directors).<BR/><BR/>There were demurrers filed.<BR/>Some were sustained with leave to amend.<BR/><BR/>The second amended complaint was issued, in which the 3rd and 4th causes of action were either removed or incorporated into other causes of action. In the second complaint there were still isues which were demurred by some of the defendants.<BR/><BR/>The second and 8th causes of action contained in the second amended complaint(which still named the Association board were successfully demurred without leave to amend.) <BR/><BR/>Those specific causes of action were then precluded from appearing in the third and current version of the complaint.<BR/><BR/>The reason that the Association was included in the lawsuit to begin with, at least according to the complaints is that it was alleged that McFarlane, Moffitt, and Vejar acted in their capacities as board members. And that the board acted to ratify their actions by not opposing them.<BR/><BR/>The general membership of the association was never included.<BR/><BR/>For the current board or any members of it, or anyone else for that matter to say that Harris sued the entire association membership is like saying that EACH OF THE 58 LAWSUITS filed by the current board were filed by NEIGHBOR AGAINST NEIGHBOR. It would be like saying that YOU (if you are a member of the association) SUED 58 of your neighbors!!<BR/><BR/>Did you? Of course not.<BR/><BR/>But this is just their way of trying to create a negative spin towards Mr. Harris.<BR/><BR/>Don't buy it.<BR/><BR/>When the third and current complaint was filed, the Association was not included. This was voluntary.<BR/><BR/>Could it have been? Absolutely!! There was no prohibition against including another and new cause of action naming the Association Board of Directors; or attaching the actions of McFarlane to the Board and thereby keeping the Board in the suit.<BR/><BR/>But Harris' attorney made a choice not to do that; and in fact inserted language into the third amended complaint which specifically separated McFarlanes actions from the actions of a board member.<BR/><BR/>Right now would be a good time to ask yourself, "Then why is the Board still defending Mrs. McFarlane? Her attorney bill is in the tens of thousands of dollars?" If she is not being sued as a board member, why are we picking up the tab?<BR/><BR/>It was also interesting to read why Moffitt was successfully demurred from the suit.<BR/><BR/>Harris' attorney alleged a violation of government code against Moffitt for hostility in the work place, and harassment (and the rest of the board for not stiffling him when he got out of line).<BR/><BR/>You should read the allegations made against Moffitt by Harris. And yet Moffitt never denies a single one!<BR/><BR/>His attorney demurrs stating that such conduct by a board member towards a contractor is protected because the contractor is not considered an employee.<BR/><BR/>While there is a specific statement in the government code addressing the issue of a contractor who is required to office 'on site' and states that for the purposes of the statute the contractor should be considered an employee.... nevertheless the judge ruled in favor of the Association and granted the demurrer. (read it for yourself)<BR/><BR/>This is the way court proceedings go. They are very interesting to say the least.<BR/><BR/>The Association is now seeking to amend its cross complaint against Harris. It will be interesting to see if there is further amending of the original complaint by Harris.<BR/><BR/>Here is the point. Any decision outside a specific instruction of the court is a voluntary decision by the party.<BR/><BR/>For Harris' atty NOT to include the Association in the third amended and current complaint was voluntary, no matter what anyone tells you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com